Driving Efficiency with Compensation Plans: A LinkedIn Discussion about Incentive Compensation

A few weeks ago, Jackie Klein (an Analytics Consultant from Wells Fargo) sparked a great discussion when she posed a question to the Incentive Compensation LinkedIn Group:

How should I balance three incentive plan metrics to reduce costs and drive efficiency—without sacrificing productivity or quality?

The three metrics were:

  1. Efficiency
  2. Productivity
  3. Quality

Here’s a summary of responses from the experts:

Jackie’s done a good job of not complicating her plan by limiting herself to three simple metrics.  See here for a guide to choosing the Right Sales Performance Metrics.

(Experts: Alex Murchie, Equinix; David Cichelli, Alexander Group)

Each metric should be weighted over 15% to make it substantial enough to attract her team’s attention.

(Expert: Mike Rose, Infotensity)

If Jackie finds that low quality becomes an issue, she could try linking the efficiency and quality metrics. However, the linked metrics shouldn’t exceed 70% of total compensation

(Expert: Howard Norton, Norton Godwin Ltd)

Some other great questions + thoughts:

Measurements:

  • Is this an ongoing measurement, a quarterly report, or is there a “live” dashboard showing the three metrics?
  • How quickly can a metric change thanks to employee action?
  • How much is the metric due to single employee vs. group vs. company?
  • Do you have a leaderboard ranking showing how certain teams / divisions / employees are doing against different measures?

Payments:

  • How often are you paying? Is this for an annual bonus similar to a profit sharing measure, a quarterly bonus, or a monthly payment?
  • How much pay is at risk? Is there enough of a bump in OTE after taxes to get the employees attention and drive performance based on pay?

The calculation / plan setup:

  • If there is no variation in productivity, you could consider dropping it.
  • Have a payout matrix for Efficiency and Quality where a percent payout is earned at the intersection of the two scores. The final percent could then be further adjusted by productivity if don’t want to drop that one.

(Expert: Erik Charles, Xactly Corporation)

What advice would you add?

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>